Home Firm Launch Marketing & Growth Systems & Automation Staffing & Operations Fractional Operations AI Intake Clio Consulting Lawmatics Consulting ROI Calculator Case Studies Medical Portfolio Blog Locations About Free Strategy Review
Smokeball Configuration

Smokeball Configuration for
Document-Heavy Practices

Smokeball’s case for existing is passive time capture and a very large form library. Both only pay off if the matter types, templates and billing rules underneath them are built for your practice.

Request a Free Strategy Review →

Strengths

Where Smokeball Genuinely Wins

  • Automatic time capture — Smokeball records work performed in the platform and in Microsoft applications without anyone starting a timer. That matters more than it sounds: Clio’s 2025 Legal Trends Report put average billable capture at roughly 2.9 hours in an eight-hour day, and passive capture attacks that gap directly rather than asking attorneys to change behavior.
  • Document automation with conditional logic — a template engine that merges matter and client data, with a Word add-in so templates are built inside Office rather than in a separate tool.
  • A very large form library — 20,000-plus federal, state and local court forms, plus a couple of hundred pre-built matter types.
  • Deep Microsoft integration — email linked to matters directly in Outlook, documents saved to matters from Word. For firms that live in Office, this is the difference-maker.

Failure Modes

Where Firms Get Stuck

  • Matter types accepted as shipped — the pre-built types are a starting point, not a configuration. Firms that never customize them end up with fields they don’t use and missing the ones they need for reporting.
  • Templates nobody built — the document automation is the reason most firms buy Smokeball, and building templates with conditional logic is genuinely fiddly. Firms routinely pay for the capability and keep drafting from old documents.
  • Captured time that never becomes billed time — automatic capture produces entries. Turning entries into invoices still requires billing workflow, review discipline and a defined cycle.
  • Trust accounting configured loosely, same as anywhere else.

Scope

What We Configure

  • Matter type architecture built to your practice areas
  • Document templates with conditional logic for your recurring documents
  • Time capture review workflow, so entries get approved and billed rather than accumulating
  • Billing rules, rate tables and invoicing cycle
  • Trust account structure and reconciliation
  • Outlook and Word workflow conventions your team will actually follow
  • Reporting on capture rate, realization and collection
  • Staff training

Fit

Is Smokeball Right for You?

Yes, likely, if you’re a small firm doing high volumes of jurisdiction-specific forms — real estate, estate planning, family law, immigration, PI — and your team already works in Microsoft Office.

Probably not if you need a broad third-party integration ecosystem, or you’re already on Clio or MyCase and reasonably satisfied. Smokeball sits at the higher end on price, and moving to it means migrating matter data for a benefit concentrated in document and time capture.

Clio vs Smokeball →  ·  Other platforms →

Common Questions

About Smokeball

It depends almost entirely on document volume and time capture discipline. Firms drafting jurisdiction-specific forms daily, or firms whose partners chronically under-record billable time, tend to recover the higher subscription cost quickly. Firms with low document volume and good timekeeping habits generally won’t.
Yes — the template engine supports conditional logic and merges from matter and client records. The constraint is build effort rather than capability: templates with real conditional branching take deliberate work to construct, which is the most common reason firms own the feature without using it.

Get Smokeball Configured Properly

Request a free Strategy Review. We’ll assess how your firm works and what Smokeball would need to do for it.